Second hit on OS kernel architecture model design

As computer science illustrates:
a goal based model agent does the routine
perception, rule matching and goal mapping
in order to approximate the actions to deal
with the subset of the unobserved conditions.
Consequently, what will be the input of the
change ? kernel, specifically core kernel
modules seems relative stable. What else ?
security patches ? certified third party
drivers ? system library ? user lander
applications ? Is this the time to review the
challenge traditional open system kernel
architecture model design to deal with
complexity ? It is the common control,
plan and game algorithms, models along with
economic models inspires CS scientists
to review the challenges for OS vendors.
Microsoft is not alone. I will be valuable
to investigate the asymptotical notation
for both best cases and worst cases.

On the another hand, what will be business
intelligence to protect OS vendor market
shares along with the user land applications
for OS players ? Does the user land application
continue lock end users ? What will be the
economic and innovative delivery model for
both OS vendors and application providers ?
What OS vendors can really get from open
sources or open services environment ?

Many and Many questions and thoughts ?!


http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/27/technology/27soft.html?hp&ex=1143522000&en=1c725e1c50ae8d6c&ei=5094&partner=homepage